
Ishoni Networks
Broadband engines for residential and business customers.
Date | Investors | Amount | Round |
---|---|---|---|
investor investor | €0.0 | round | |
investor investor investor investor investor | €0.0 | round | |
investor investor investor investor investor investor investor investor | €0.0 | round | |
N/A | $25.0m | Series D | |
Total Funding | 000k |
Ishoni Networks Inc. operated as a communications chip developer headquartered in Santa Clara, California, commencing its activities in 1998. The company positioned itself in the semiconductor market, focusing on producing broadband-engine technology and gateway-on-a-chip solutions. Its target clientele consisted of manufacturers of broadband customer premises equipment (CPE), such as residential gateways and Integrated Access Devices (IADs). Ishoni's core offering was an integrated, modular solution comprised of both silicon and software, providing a platform that ranged from a basic system to a complete turnkey solution for its manufacturing partners.
The company's operations were managed by President and CEO William Lee. Ishoni Networks demonstrated significant early-stage traction, securing substantial venture capital investment. Across three financing rounds, the company raised approximately $65 million. A notable Series C funding round in March 2001 brought in $35 million, led by Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund I, with participation from new and existing investors including Bessemer Venture Partners, Credit Suisse First Boston, and Lucent Venture Partners. The capital was intended to expand the development and marketing of its broadband technology.
However, the company's trajectory was severely impacted by significant operational and legal challenges. Ishoni established a subsidiary in Bangalore, India, to manage software engineering, a move that led to complications. In 2003, the firm faced a crisis involving its Indian subsidiary, where executives were accused of attempting to bankrupt the parent company and illegally copy its software to establish a rival firm. This internal turmoil coincided with the broader market downturn following the burst of the dot-com bubble, which deferred telecommunications network upgrades for years. These combined pressures ultimately led to the company's failure, and it is now considered defunct.
Keywords: communications chip maker, broadband-engine technology, residential gateways, gateway-on-a-chip, CPE solutions, VoIP chip developer, semiconductor, IADs, dot-com bubble, silicon-and-software, network processors, venture capital, broadband CPE, telecom infrastructure, integrated access devices